Post by cmwy10a on Aug 15, 2012 17:19:11 GMT -5
I am new to this forum and don't know if this has been discussed before. It strikes me as possibly relevant and important but have not seen it discussed. There were some leaks on the report from a supposed insider which were strongly reject by Freeh. If memory serves me his said at one point the leaks did not come from any one in the Freeh group. He then said that no one outside the investigation had any info before the release publicly.
I was amazed when I heard it stated at the beginning of the BOT conference call that the NCAA was getting bi-weeky reports from Freeh. Was this approved by PSU- they implied during the call that they were unaware of this. Why would anyone with a brain let Freeh brief the NCAA and not brief PSU. In fact why would they ever allow that. Something here really stinks or am I over reacting to this issue. This briefing is contrary to Freeh's claim that no one outside the investigation had info- another Freeh Lie and another STUPID decision by our leadership.
I was amazed when I heard it stated at the beginning of the BOT conference call that the NCAA was getting bi-weeky reports from Freeh. Was this approved by PSU- they implied during the call that they were unaware of this. Why would anyone with a brain let Freeh brief the NCAA and not brief PSU. In fact why would they ever allow that. Something here really stinks or am I over reacting to this issue. This briefing is contrary to Freeh's claim that no one outside the investigation had info- another Freeh Lie and another STUPID decision by our leadership.
